"I'm a Christian because it makes me happy."
Nearly every Christian I’ve met speaks of Christianity in
a utilitarian way. That is, Christians are Christians because it “works”: it
makes you feel happy; it gives you hope; it gives you joy; it gives you
community; it makes you rich; it gives you blessings.
Of course, because they believe this, when they speak of
Christianity with others, they “sell” Christianity in utilitarian terms: “Don’t
you want to be happy?” “Don’t you want to go to heaven?”
You see what that does? (And this is a really big deal) It makes Christianity a subjective
preference.
For example, replace “Christianity” with any hobby.
Bob = “Why did you start jogging?”
You = “Oh…because it makes me happy. It gives me joy. It
gives me hope that my body will last longer.”
Bob = “Huh. Well, I get all those things met by swimming.”
You = “Yeah, it’s a very personal choice in life.”
Bob = “Huh.”
You = “But, it’s really important that you consider
taking up jogging. It’ll make you happy too.”
Bob = “No thanks. Again, I’m already happy enough.”
Here, jogging = Christianity. Replace jogging with any
other “personal practice.” Eating chocolate. Reading books. Whatever.
And therein lays the chief problem: Christianity is not a subjective preference.
Moreover, people will never adopt a new subjective preference if they already get that need met.
Now, don’t get me wrong. Like I said in the beginning,
many, many, many people choose to be a Christian because it meets certain
needs. I know that people do it; I’m
suggesting that this should not be a
reason to become a Christian.
Does this mean that Christianity can’t provide certain
needs? Of course not. As a Christian, I do
receive hope, joy, etc. from Christianity. But, that’s not why I’m a Christian.
I’m a Christian because it’s true. That is, Christianity is a religion (yes, it is;
it’s not just a “relationship”) with plenty of facts that are either true or
false. For example, it is simply irrelevant what joy, happiness, or peace I
receive from the fact that Jesus existed, ushered the Kingdom of God, died on
the cross, offering me liberation from evil and forgiveness, and was raised to
new life as living Lord.
These facts are objectively
true. “Objective” means “true, independent of my personal preference.” Think of
2+2=4. It is simply irrelevant what peripheral emotional needs get met from
that fact. At bare minimum, I believe 2+2=4 because it’s true. After I accept that fact, I want to teach other people
that 2+2=4. Why? Because I choose to believe things that are true and I assume you also want to believe things are true.
Christianity is either true or false. What emotional
needs I get met from Christianity are important, yes, but they are what happen after I come to accept the truth of
Christianity.
Imagine this crazy example:
You =“David, why did you get married to Elaine?”
Me = “Oh, because I knew that getting married would make
me happy, give me joy, and hope that life could get better.
You = “So you got married to have your emotional needs
met.”
Me = “Sure. Absolutely.”
You = “So, the reason you got married was that you could use your wife for your emotional needs.”
Me = “Yes, that’s right. In fact, you too should get
married to get your needs met.”
Wow. Imagine using my wife and my marriage just so that
my own needs get met. So many people I’ve met use God in the exact same way.
And guess what happens when trauma and disaster strike? (And I know this from
years of counseling) They come to me in tears, wondering why God “has failed
them” and they leave their feckless faith. This is so unfortunate. (Of course, I
care deeply for their pain. My point is that their “leaving the faith” is
really about having false expectations that Christianity was supposed to make
certain they were blessed, rich, happy, etc.) Their version of Christianity “didn’t
work.” So, they drop that habit as if it were a failed diet plan.
People will always abandon a subjective preference when it no longer works for them.
People will always abandon a subjective preference when it no longer works for them.
I’m not saying any of this to attempt to shame you. I’m
writing this in the hopes that you and I can agree together to stop saying that
people should become Christians because it meets certain needs.
You = “David, are you a Christian?”
Me = “Yes. I sure am.”
You = “Why?”
Me = “Great question. I’m a Christian because Christianity
is true. In my life, I do my best to commit to things that are true. What about
you? Do you choose to adopt things that are true in life?”
You = “True? What makes it true? I thought religion was a
personal choice.”
Me = “I would love to tell you why it’s true. . .”
Want a tip? Stop using language like, “I feel like Christianity. . .” or “I believe that. . .” (which in American
English implies subjective uncertainty) instead, use language like, “I know
that. . .” or “It’s true that. . .” or “It’s a fact that. . .”
Does this make you anxious? Are you scared that you don’t
know whether or not Christianity is true? Then commence the search. Start
reading literature that answers your questions. In fact, that’s one of the
chief reasons I wrote my own book, A
Skeptic Challenges a Christian. In addition to books, go seek out trusted
Christian friends who know more than you do and get some answers. Whatever you
do, don’t give up.